

Sex Offenders Can’t Adopt, but They Can Buy a Baby? | 7/31/25
Jul 31, 2025
A viral social media post highlights a gay couple’s acquisition of a baby through surrogacy, igniting debates about the ethics of such arrangements. Critics argue that surrogacy may not prioritize the child's well-being, especially when one parent has a history as a convicted sex offender. The discussion dives into the societal backlash against surrogacy, the implications of parentage, and calls for legislative changes to better protect children’s interests amidst growing concerns.
AI Snips
Chapters
Transcript
Episode notes
Evolution of Gay Adoption Argument
- Gay adoption was initially justified as a last resort for providing homes to children in need.
- Over time, it shifted to portraying gay couples as equal or superior parents, discarding the previous humility.
Moral Issues with Surrogacy
- Surrogacy is morally distinct from adoption as it involves creating life for commercial sale.
- It causes significant harm to the surrogate mother and often leads to dark outcomes for children.
Abuse Risks in Non-Biological Homes
- Presence of unrelated adults, especially men, poses significant abuse risks to children.
- Children in gay surrogacy cases face a heightened risk of abuse akin to a game of Russian roulette.