The Big Story Breaking down the Hockey Canada sex assault trial so far
May 20, 2025
Join CityNews journalist Michelle Mackey as she delves into the shocking Hockey Canada sexual assault trial involving five former players. She provides insight into the intense courtroom atmosphere and the complexities of covering such a high-profile case. Mackey discusses the emotional toll on the complainant, E.M., as she bravely shares her traumatic experience. The trial's shift from jury to judge alone raises significant questions about consent and accountability in sports culture, sparking vital conversations about lasting change.
AI Snips
Chapters
Transcript
Episode notes
Central Role of Consent Allegations
- The complainant, E.M., alleges that after initial consensual sex, multiple men engaged in non-consensual acts with her without her consent.
- She describes fear, dissociation, and being coerced into sexual acts, highlighting the central issue of consent in the trial.
Exhaustion from Cross-Examination
- E.M. endured seven full days of grueling cross-examinations by five defense teams.
- She appeared exhausted as her memories and language choices were relentlessly challenged.
Intoxication Debate in Trial
- Defense questioned how drunk E.M. was to challenge her ability to consent, key to the Crown's case.
- They pointed out discrepancies such as drink quantities and her weight to weaken the intoxication claim.