Political Fix To tax, but who to tax, that is the question
Nov 7, 2025
In this discussion, Jim Pickard, Deputy Political Editor at the Financial Times, examines the impact of Rachel Reeves' recent speech on tax expectations. Sam Fleming, Economics Editor, weighs the pros and cons of potential tax increases versus varied fiscal measures, highlighting risks to government credibility. Katie Martin shares insights on bond market responses and the implications for the UK economy. The trio also debates labor’s past fiscal choices, the potential for fiscal consolidation, and investor sentiments regarding future leadership.
AI Snips
Chapters
Transcript
Episode notes
Trade-Off Between Big Tax Rise And Pick‑And‑Mix
- Raising income tax is administratively easy and disinflationary compared with many small targeted taxes.
- A single big tax rise risks huge political damage, while many small measures irritate many interest groups.
Speech Was A Public Prep For Tax Rises
- Rachel Reeves' surprise speech seemed aimed at preparing the general public for tax increases rather than internal party messaging.
- Her language about 'everyone playing their part' suggested an income tax rise was likely.
Label Tax Hikes As Service Funding — Political Cover
- Framing tax rises as funding specific public services can make them more politically palatable.
- But Reeves faces the problem that taxes may just be needed to 'stand still' rather than to fund new commitments.