"Panpsychism," says Thomas Nagel, “appears to follow from a few simple premises, each of which is more plausible than its denial, though not perhaps more plausible than the denial of panpsychism.” Any non-panpsychist is going to have to deny one of these four premises: (1) Material composition, (2) Realism, (3) Nonreductionism, or (4) Nonemergence. Panpsychism seems to follow from these, and those who don’t accept the view will have to deny one of the four.

Note: I switched premises 2 and 3. Nagel’s second premise is Nonreductionism and mine is Realism (I thought this was the more logical order). So when I’m referencing premises, I’m always referring to *my* second and third premises, not Nagel’s.

In this clip, we discuss the four basic premises underlying panpsychism. Support Walden Pod for access to the full version on the Patron Feed here: https://www.patreon.com/waldenpod

Panpsychism - Thomas Nagel [PDF]

Moral Questions - Nagel [Amazon]

Leave a review of Walden Pod [iTunes]

Check out the blog at https://emersongreenblog.wordpress.com/

Contact me at emersongreen@protonmail.com or at https://www.facebook.com/counterapologeticspodcast

#112 Eine Arktis ohne Eis? - Antje Boetius & Corinne Flick