
Theory & Philosophy
Giorgio Agamben vs. Michel Foucault
Nov 29, 2023
Exploring the disagreements between Agamben and Foucault on biopolitics, evolution of sovereign power, prisons and racialization, use of science to justify racism, bio-political power and its consequences, and perspectives on bare life and dehumanization.
19:50
AI Summary
Highlights
AI Chapters
Episode notes
Podcast summary created with Snipd AI
Quick takeaways
- Foucault distinguishes between sovereign power and biopolitics, emphasizing the establishment of norms and standards for a healthy body and a law-abiding citizen.
- Agamben challenges Foucault's focus on zoe, arguing that sovereign power controls both zoe and bios, with the authority to determine who lives and dies, as demonstrated in ongoing issues like police violence and imperialism.
Deep dives
Foucault's Notion of Power and Biopolitics
Foucault distinguishes power dynamics and shifts in Europe, moving from sovereign power held by royalty to a more managerial power in the capitalist economy. He explains the concept of biopower, when the understanding of life and control over bodies becomes important. This knowledge leads to the establishment of norms and standards for a healthy body and a law-abiding citizen. Foucault argues that biopolitical power channels and shapes individuals to conform to these norms, but also notes that such power can result in systematic violence, like the Holocaust, targeting those who deviate from the norm.
Remember Everything You Learn from Podcasts
Save insights instantly, chat with episodes, and build lasting knowledge - all powered by AI.