#121 Exploring Bayesian Structural Equation Modeling, with Nathaniel Forde

Dec 11, 2024

Nathaniel Forde, a staff data scientist at Personio and a contributor to the PyMC ecosystem, shares insights on Bayesian structural equation modeling. He highlights the importance of confirmatory factor analysis in validating constructs and discusses the flexibility of Bayesian methods in analyzing complex relationships. Forde emphasizes the necessity of model validation and sensitivity analysis to ensure robust findings. He also reflects on his journey into data science, noting how early challenges shaped his approach to data quality and causal inference.

Ask episode

AI Snips

Chapters

Transcript

Episode notes

INSIGHT

Confirmatory Factor Analysis

Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) is a dimensional reduction technique.
CFA differs from classic factor analysis by focusing on pre-defined theoretical constructs, like "mathematical aptitude".

INSIGHT

Structural Equation Modeling

Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) extends CFA by adding explicit structure, like regression relationships between latent constructs.
SEM allows for complex dependency chains, increasing the model's explanatory power.

ANECDOTE

HR Analytics and SEM/CFA

Nathaniel's work at Personio, an HR platform, involves analyzing employee engagement surveys.
These surveys, often complex and multi-themed, are well-suited for SEM and CFA.

Get the Snipd Podcast app to discover more snips from this episode

Get the app

Proudly sponsored by PyMC Labs, the Bayesian Consultancy. Book a call, or get in touch!

Our theme music is « Good Bayesian », by Baba Brinkman (feat MC Lars and Mega Ran). Check out his awesome work!

Visit our Patreon page to unlock exclusive Bayesian swag ;)

Takeaways:

CFA is commonly used in psychometrics to validate theoretical constructs.
Theoretical structure is crucial in confirmatory factor analysis.
Bayesian approaches offer flexibility in modeling complex relationships.
Model validation involves both global and local fit measures.
Sensitivity analysis is vital in Bayesian modeling to avoid skewed results.
Complex models should be justified by their ability to answer specific questions.
The choice of model complexity should balance fit and theoretical relevance. Fitting models to real data builds confidence in their validity.
Divergences in model fitting indicate potential issues with model specification.
Factor analysis can help clarify causal relationships between variables.
Survey data is a valuable resource for understanding complex phenomena.
Philosophical training enhances logical reasoning in data science.
Causal inference is increasingly recognized in industry applications.
Effective communication is essential for data scientists.
Understanding confounding is crucial for accurate modeling.

Chapters:

10:11 Understanding Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) and Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA)

20:11 Application of SEM and CFA in HR Analytics

30:10 Challenges and Advantages of Bayesian Approaches in SEM and CFA

33:58 Evaluating Bayesian Models

39:50 Challenges in Model Building

44:15 Causal Relationships in SEM and CFA

49:01 Practical Applications of SEM and CFA

51:47 Influence of Philosophy on Data Science

54:51 Designing Models with Confounding in Mind

57:39 Future Trends in Causal Inference

01:00:03 Advice for Aspiring Data Scientists

01:02:48 Future Research Directions

Thank you to my Patrons for making this episode possible!

Yusuke Saito, Avi Bryant, Ero Carrera, Giuliano Cruz, Tim Gasser, James Wade, Tradd Salvo, William Benton, James Ahloy,