James O'Brien Daily If Trump invades Greenland, what can we actually do?
89 snips
Jan 6, 2026 The podcast dives into the controversial claim by Stephen Miller about Trump's interest in annexing Greenland. Discussions revolve around military implications and potential troop build-ups. Is it plausible for Europe to resist a US occupation? The role of NATO in maintaining European stability is critically examined, highlighting the risks of its collapse. Listeners offer compelling views, questioning NATO's effectiveness amid US assertiveness. The logistic challenges of mineral extraction and the Greenlanders' ties to Denmark add a fascinating layer to the conversation.
AI Snips
Chapters
Books
Transcript
Episode notes
Greenland Threat Undermines Rules-Based Order
- The Greenland threats reveal a broader danger to the post-war rules-based order and NATO's credibility.
- If NATO cannot protect member territory, the alliance's deterrent and European peace risk collapse.
Timing Determines Contestability Of Occupation
- A US troop buildup in Greenland could reach a tipping point where reversal becomes impossible.
- International response timing will determine whether occupation can be resisted or accepted.
Caller: Scandinavians Know Arctic Warfare
- Eric in High Wycombe argued Scandinavians and nearby NATO members hold superior Arctic warfare expertise and equipment.
- He claimed Europe could militarily challenge US forces in Greenland if it came to open conflict.
