Issues, Etc. Early Christian Creeds, Part 3 – Dr. Ken Schurb, 10/31/25 (3042)
Oct 31, 2025
Dr. Ken Schurb, a noted church historian and Evangelism Executive for the Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod, dives into the historical significance of the Nicene Creed as its 1700th anniversary approaches. He explains how creeds emerged from historical errors and the theological disputes of early Christianity. Schurb details the pivotal role of Constantine, the heated debates between Arius and Alexander, and the council's rejection of Arianism. The discussion also highlights the council's decisions, including fixing Easter's date and the adoption of homoousios.
AI Snips
Chapters
Books
Transcript
Episode notes
Creeds Respond To Historical Crises
- The Council of Nicaea (325) responded to real historical disputes, not abstract committee drafting.
- Its creed arose from conflicts like Arianism and concerns about modalism within the church.
Constantine's Political Motive
- Constantine called Nicaea after consolidating imperial power to secure unity across the empire.
- He offered financial support and political pressure to resolve a theological dispute that threatened imperial stability.
Alexandria As The Flashpoint
- The controversy centered in Alexandria around Arius, who accused Bishop Alexander of modalism.
- Athanasius emerged as the decisive defender of the orthodox view against Arius's claims.
