Open Science: Moving from Possible to Expected to Required
Sep 26, 2023
auto_awesome
The podcast explores the movement of scientific ideals towards reality, with a focus on open science. It discusses the motivations and challenges behind open science, the importance of replication and transparent practices in research, the need for diversity and customized solutions, and the advancements in open science and research assessment in the next 10 years.
The Center for Open Science aims to increase openness, integrity, and reproducibility in research by advocating for pre-registration as a valuable practice to improve rigor and transparency.
The Center for Open Science follows a pyramid of culture change strategy, starting with making better practices possible and ultimately aiming for them to be required and integrated into reward systems and policy.
Deep dives
The Center for Open Science's Mission
The Center for Open Science, founded by Brian Nosek, aims to increase openness, integrity, and reproducibility in research. It seeks to address the challenge of a reward system that values novel positive findings over rigor, transparency, and open pursuit of knowledge.
The Shift in Perception and Acceptance of Open Science
When the Center for Open Science was launched in 2013, reactions were mixed. Skeptics questioned why such an organization was necessary and feared the potential damage to the field of psychology. However, others welcomed the initiative, recognizing the need for change and the opportunity to improve science. Over time, the conversation around open science has shifted from skepticism to acceptance and empowerment, especially among early career researchers.
The Importance of Practices like Pre-Registration
One of the key practices advocated by the Center for Open Science is pre-registration, which involves documenting research plans and methods in advance. Pre-registration addresses issues such as publication bias, ensures transparency, and helps evaluate the credibility of research findings. Initially met with resistance and fear of repercussions, pre-registration has now gained momentum, with researchers realizing its value in improving rigor and reproducibility. Efforts are being made to integrate pre-registration into the reward system, making it a requirement for publication and career advancement.
A decade ago, University of Virginia psychology professor Brian Nosek cofounded an unusual nonprofit, the Center for Open Science. It’s been a cheerleader, enabler, and nagger to convince scientists that making their methods, data, and papers available to others makes for better science.
The Center for Open Science has built tools to register analysis plans and hypotheses before data are collected. It campaigns for authors and journals to state explicitly whether and where data and other research materials are available. Gradually, practices that were considered fringe are becoming mainstream. The White House declared 2023 the Year of Open Science.
Nosek refers to the pyramid of culture change as his strategy to push for reforms: first make a better practice possible, then easy, expected, rewarding, and finally, required. It starts with building infrastructure, then experience, reward systems, and ultimately policy.
In this podcast, Brian Nosek joins host Monya Baker to discuss the movement of scientific ideals toward reality.