2/15/24 Leonard Goodman on Biden’s Attempt to Imprison Antiwar Dissidents
Feb 20, 2024
auto_awesome
Criminal defense lawyer Leonard Goodman discusses the government's attempt to imprison antiwar dissidents. They delve into the flimsy case against the Uhuru Movement, accused of spreading Russian propaganda on Ukraine. Topics include free speech, activism against colonialism, unjust accusations, discord in activism, and the importance of defending First Amendment rights.
The case against the African People Socialist Party highlights the dangerous precedent of prosecuting political dissent under the guise of unconstitutionality and vague allegations.
The evidence presented in the case lacks specificity, relying on weak allegations and vague interpretations that undermine the principles of free speech and political activism.
Deep dives
The African People Socialist Party and their free speech case
The African People Socialist Party is facing a troubling and dangerous case that arises from the aftermath of Russia gate and is directly related to the war in Ukraine. The party, founded in 1972, is a black leftist activist group that opposes colonialism and advocates for African people worldwide. The party has been critical of the US government for 50 years and has spoken out against US involvement in Ukraine and NATO expansion. They have their own newspaper and radio station, making them harder to censor. However, they have recently been indicted under an obscure statute, 18 USC 951, which charges them with being unregistered Russian agents. The indictment alleges that their speeches and publications are now spreading Russian propaganda and disinformation, despite the fact that their views and activism have not changed. It is a weak case with no concrete evidence beyond the allegation that they received minimal financial support from a person allegedly connected to the Kremlin.
The First Amendment and the dangerous implications of the case
The case against the African People Socialist Party raises serious First Amendment concerns. The defense argues that even if the allegations in the indictment were true, it would still be an unconstitutional prosecution. The party's speeches and publications, which express their views and criticize US policies, are protected speech. The government's claim that their speech is under the direction or control of Russia is unfounded and dangerous. The prosecution hinges on an incredibly vague interpretation of the statute, which leaves room for arbitrary and chilling interpretations of political speech. The willingness to prosecute based on political dissent can set a dangerous precedent for freedom of speech in the United States.
The weak evidence and inconsistencies in the case
The evidence presented in the case is weak and lacks specificity. The indictment alleges that the party became Russian agents after a trip to Moscow in 2015 and receiving financial support. However, there are no details about any agreement, terms, or obligations between the party and Russia. The alleged financial support, totaling about $7,000 over six years, was primarily used to support a speaking tour on the issue of reparations. The government's argument that their speeches align with Russian propaganda is disproven by the fact that prominent intellectuals in the US hold similar views. The case relies on vague allegations and speculation, rather than concrete evidence of wrongdoing.
The danger of setting a precedent
Allowing the case against the African People Socialist Party to proceed sets a dangerous precedent for free speech. The persecution of political activists based on their ideological alignment and criticisms of government positions can have a chilling effect on political discourse. The government's focus on suppressing dissenting voices rather than engaging in open dialogue undermines the principles of free speech and democratic values. Furthermore, the case sends a message to activists that their political opinions could lead to legal trouble and raids on their homes. The outcome of the case will have significant implications for the future of free speech and political activism in the United States.
Scott is joined by Leonard Goodman, an attorney for the Uhuru Movement. The Uhuru Movement, or Uhuru 3, is a group of American black socialist activists who are currently being charged for spreading Russian propaganda and disinformation about the war in Ukraine. Scott and Goodman dig into the details and talk about how flimsy and dangerous the government’s case is.