Snipd AI
MIT study finds that only 23% of jobs that could be automated would be cost effective. Discussion on AI Biden robocaller and concerns about election fraud. Updates on AI developments like GRAK 1.5 and Google's goals. Limits on personalized persuasion apps and discussion on AI's impact on elections.
Read more

Podcast summary created with Snipd AI

Quick takeaways

  • According to a recent MIT study, only 23% of jobs that could be automated would have economics that made sense to do so, suggesting that AI job displacement will be gradual and limited by cost.
  • The use of AI-generated content, such as fake Biden robocalls, highlights concerns about the potential for disruptive purposes and suppressing voter turnout in elections.

Deep dives

Study on Automation of Vision Tasks

A study from MIT called 'Beyond AI Exposure' explores the cost-effectiveness of automating vision tasks using computer vision. The study finds that at current costs, most US businesses would not find it economically attractive to automate vision tasks, with only 23% of worker wages being paid for vision tasks deemed suitable for automation. This suggests that while AI job displacement will occur, it will be gradual and limited by cost, allowing time for policy changes and minimizing disruption.

Get the Snipd
podcast app

Unlock the knowledge in podcasts with the podcast player of the future.
App store bannerPlay store banner

AI-powered
podcast player

Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features

Discover
highlights

Listen to the best highlights from the podcasts you love and dive into the full episode

Save any
moment

Hear something you like? Tap your headphones to save it with AI-generated key takeaways

Share
& Export

Send highlights to Twitter, WhatsApp or export them to Notion, Readwise & more

AI-powered
podcast player

Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features

Discover
highlights

Listen to the best highlights from the podcasts you love and dive into the full episode