The debate over Snowden's actions regarding NSA surveillance

Advocates argue that Snowden's revelations were necessary to protect privacy and expose government secrecy. They believe that the public has a right to know about mass surveillance programs and that Snowden's actions have sparked important debates and potential reforms. Critics claim that Snowden's disclosures have harmed national security by revealing classified information to enemies of the United States. They argue that there were more appropriate channels for Snowden to address his concerns, such as going to Congress or internal oversight bodies. The debate highlights the tension between the need for security and the protection of civil liberties in a democratic society.