
The LRB Podcast Is ‘Wuthering Heights’ amoral?
Wuthering Heights As Amoral Literature
- Reviewers judged Wuthering Heights as “completely amoral,” and David Trotter agrees with that verdict.
- The novel resists respectable moral lessons and foregrounds consequences over motives.
The Novel As A Canine World
- Patricia Lockwood argues Wuthering Heights plays out in the animal world, especially dogs, with characters behaving like canine avatars.
- David Trotter recounts Emily Brontë peppering fighting dogs to break up a street fight, reinforcing that view.
Landscape And Chronology Structure The Plot
- Wuthering Heights spans generations and carefully maps time and place from 1771 to 1803.
- The two houses, Wuthering Heights and Thrushcross Grange, structure the novel's social and temporal consequences.










































Emily Brontë died on 19 December 1848. As Patricia Lockwood said in an episode of Close Readings, there is evidence that Brontë was writing a second novel to follow ‘Wuthering Heights’, but if she was, it has been lost, and it has been suggested, though never proved, that her sister Charlotte might have destroyed it. But what could possibly be in that lost novel, Lockwood wondered, that was worse, more unacceptable, than what we find in ‘Wuthering Heights’?
To mark the anniversary, we’re releasing the full version of this episode from the Close Readings series ‘Novel Approaches’. David Trotter and Patricia Lockwood join Thomas Jones to discuss Brontë’s only surviving novel, one Trotter describes as ‘completely amoral’.
Readings by Alex Colley
Give a gift subscription to Close Readings for Christmas: https://lrb.me/audiogifts
From the LRB
Subscribe to the LRB: https://lrb.me/subslrbpod
Close Readings podcast: https://lrb.me/crlrbpod
LRB Audiobooks: https://lrb.me/audiobookslrbpod
Bags, binders and more at the LRB Store: https://lrb.me/storelrbpod
Get in touch: podcasts@lrb.co.uk

