Josh Levin, a Slate journalist and host of the Slow Burn podcast, dives deep into the troubling rise of political violence in the U.S. He discusses how violent rhetoric echoes through history and its implications today. The conversation shifts to Fox News and its significant role in shaping political discourse, along with personal anecdotes about its influence. Levin also touches on the intersection of media dynamics and political strategies, raising critical questions about extremism and public perception amid an increasingly polarized environment.
Political violence in America has deep historical roots, exacerbated by recent incendiary rhetoric, particularly from right-leaning figures like Donald Trump.
The 2024 presidential race shows a dynamic shift in polling, especially in pivotal swing states, underscoring localized campaigning's significance.
The evolving role of Fox News highlights media's power in shaping public discourse, emphasizing the divide between news reporting and opinion-driven narratives.
Deep dives
The Rise of Political Violence
Recent events have raised alarms about a resurgence of political violence in America, particularly illustrated by the foiled assassination attempts against Donald Trump. The conversation explores how such violence is not a new phenomenon in American politics but rather a historical pattern, suggesting that it has always been present beneath the surface. John Dickerson compares the current climate to a staph infection, where existing issues can worsen if not properly managed, highlighting that norms meant to suppress such violence have begun to fray. It is discussed that hateful and violent rhetoric, especially from right-leaning circles, has contributed significantly to this dismal trend, necessitating a reassessment of the societal impacts of such expressions.
Impact of Rhetoric on Violence
The dialogue delves into the complex relationship between public figures and the violent reactions they provoke, particularly regarding Donald Trump. It is suggested that Trump's own incendiary rhetoric has contributed to a culture where he can be seen as both a perpetrator and a victim of political discourse. The conversation touches on the dangerous capacity of language to both escalate tensions and incite violent actions, posing a question about the responsibilities of public figures in using their platforms. Emphasizing the polarization in political discourse, the episode argues that this has created a volatile atmosphere where emotions and tensions frequently spill over into actual violence.
Changing Landscape of Political Expression
A notable theme in the discussion is the evolving nature of free speech and its implications in the context of public safety. With the rise of extremist groups and violent protests, experts express concerns about how overly aggressive rhetoric is affecting public gatherings and community safety. The episode raises a critical question about the balance between protecting free speech and ensuring a safe environment for civic engagement. It highlights the challenges faced by lawmakers and society in regulating speech that incites fear or encourages violence while adhering to the foundational principles of free expression.
Current State of the Presidential Race
In examining the 2024 presidential election landscape, there is significant focus on the shifting polling dynamics between Kamala Harris and Donald Trump. Recent polls reflect a closer-than-expected race, particularly in key swing states like Pennsylvania, where Harris appears to be gaining momentum. This divergence between national polls and state-specific results underlines the importance of localized campaigning and voter engagement. Analysts note that while the broader national sentiment may remain static, the unique issues and voter attitudes in swing states could play a pivotal role in determining the election outcome.
The Influence of Media on Public Opinion
The episode introduces a discussion on the evolution of media, particularly Fox News, and its role in shaping public discourse and political landscapes. Through a new podcast series, insights are provided into how Fox News transformed from a fledgling network into a dominant force in American media, especially post-9/11. The impact of media narratives on audience perceptions and behavior is critically analyzed, with a focus on how partisan outlets can polarize viewers and contribute to societal divides. The conversation ultimately reflects on the balance between delivering news and engaging in opinion-driven content, a duality that significantly impacts public understanding and political engagement.
This week, Emily Bazelon, John Dickerson, and David Plotz discuss political violence and its consequences; the state of the presidential race; and The Rise of Fox News with Slow Burn’s Josh Levin.
Podcast production by Cheyna Roth
Research by Julie Huygen
Public.com+Public Investing: All investing involves risk. Brokerage services for US listed securities, options and bonds in a self-directed brokerage account are offered by Public Investing, member FINRA & SIPC. Not investment advice. Public Investing offers a High-Yield Cash Account where funds from this account are automatically deposited into partner banks where they earn interest and are eligible for FDIC insurance; Public Investing is not a bank.Cryptocurrency trading services are offered by Bakkt Crypto Solutions, LLC (NMLS ID 1828849), which is licensed to engage in virtual currency business activity by the NYSDFS. Cryptocurrency is highly speculative, involves a high degree of risk, and has the potential for loss of the entire amount of an investment. Cryptocurrency holdings are not protected by the FDIC or SIPC. . See public.com/#disclosures-main for more information.
