All In with Chris Hayes DOJ drops Epstein files with heavy redactions and big questions
Dec 20, 2025
Former U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder discusses the DOJ's failure to comply with legal obligations regarding the Epstein files, proposing serious consequences like lawsuits. Survivor Jess Michaels shares her frustrations about the redactions and demands for full transparency, highlighting ongoing advocacy efforts. Legal reporter Lisa Rubin breaks down missing investigative documents and discusses the inconsistencies in the DOJ's approach. The conversation reveals deep political implications and the pressing need for accountability in high-profile cases.
AI Snips
Chapters
Transcript
Episode notes
Selective Release Suggests Narrative Control
- The DOJ released only a partial, heavily redacted set of Epstein files that likely violate the new transparency law.
- The selective release appears aimed at controlling the narrative and protecting political allies rather than complying with Congress.
Illegal Reputation-Based Redactions
- DOJ appears to have redacted names beyond victims, possibly including politically exposed people, which the law forbids if done solely for reputational reasons.
- Inconsistencies — like many Clinton photos released but others blacked out — raise legal and political questions.
Enforce Redaction Rules Through Legal Pressure
- Congress and litigants should demand written justifications for each redaction and enforce the statute through court or contempt proceedings.
- If DOJ resists, Congress can pursue enforcement suits or consider impeachment for willful noncompliance.