Tech Policy Podcast 401: Everything NetChoice
Mar 24, 2025
Chris Marchese, the director of litigation at NetChoice, dives into the organization's mission to defend free speech online. He shares insights on numerous lawsuits regarding internet regulations, including Texas’s HB 20 and California's age-appropriate design code. Marchese argues against the idea of age-gating the web and discusses the implications of targeting social media that can harm smaller platforms. The conversation also addresses the balance between child protection and First Amendment rights in the digital landscape.
AI Snips
Chapters
Transcript
Episode notes
NetChoice's Mission
- NetChoice actively defends internet free speech through lawsuits, primarily targeting state-level legislation.
- They challenge laws dictating content moderation, data assessments, addiction claims, and age verification.
Ongoing Legal Battles
- Despite changing political climates, NetChoice continues litigation, facing the question of motive.
- States persist in these lawsuits despite a shift in the perceived online speech landscape.
NetChoice's Standing
- Some states challenge NetChoice’s standing, arguing they don’t represent platforms or users adequately.
- NetChoice emphasizes their role as an internet trade association defending members and users’ rights.