Peter Washkowitz and Shweta Rao, heads of the covenants products at Reorg, discuss super priority uptier exchanges by Serta Simmons, Trimark, and Boardriders. They explore arguments challenging these transactions and the implications for the leveraged loan market. The podcast also delves into the impact of a judge's ruling on the loan market and offers recommendations for lenders to protect their interests in the face of uptier exchanges.
Read more
AI Summary
AI Chapters
Episode notes
auto_awesome
Podcast summary created with Snipd AI
Quick takeaways
The podcast discusses three cases of super priority uptier exchanges and explores the validity of arguments presented by minority lenders.
The judge's ruling on these cases could lead to heightened friction between borrowers and lenders or call into question the trust and value of contractual relationships in the loan market.
Deep dives
Overview of the Transactions
The podcast discusses three similar transactions: search assignments, board writers, and Trimark. In all three cases, the borrowers amended their credit agreements with the consent of majority lenders to obtain super priority debt capacity. They then used this capacity for a debt-for-debt exchange with the majority lenders, relying on open market purchases. The credit agreements for board writers and Trimark also stripped the covenants. All three groups of minority lenders have sued, arguing that the transactions violated the pro-rata sharing provisions and were invalid.
Validity of Arguments
The podcast explores the validity and strength of the arguments presented by the minority lenders. While on the surface, the transactions appear to be permitted under the credit agreements, the judge may consider external factors and industry practices. From a purely document perspective, none of the minority lenders' arguments seem particularly convincing. However, it remains uncertain how a judge will rule and whether they will prioritize the contract's sanctity or consider external factors.
Consequences for the Loan Market
The podcast examines the potential consequences for the loan market based on the judge's ruling. If the judge sides with the majority lenders, it may lead to heightened friction between borrowers and lenders, with more extensive credit agreements in the future. On the other hand, if the judge deems the transactions invalid, it could call into question the trust and value of contractual relationships. Both outcomes have potential drawbacks for the loan market, making it a challenging situation to navigate.
In the latest installment in our Covenant Conversations podcast, Peter Washkowitz and Shweta Rao, the heads of the covenants products at Reorg, discuss the current state of the super priority uptier exchanges recently consummated by Serta Simmons, Trimark and Boardriders; arguments taken by minority lenders to challenge these transactions; and the implications for the leveraged loan market should these cases be litigated.
If you're not already a Reorg subscriber, request access here: go.reorg-research.com/Podcast-Trial.
Get the Snipd podcast app
Unlock the knowledge in podcasts with the podcast player of the future.
AI-powered podcast player
Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features
Discover highlights
Listen to the best highlights from the podcasts you love and dive into the full episode
Save any moment
Hear something you like? Tap your headphones to save it with AI-generated key takeaways
Share & Export
Send highlights to Twitter, WhatsApp or export them to Notion, Readwise & more
AI-powered podcast player
Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features
Discover highlights
Listen to the best highlights from the podcasts you love and dive into the full episode