A rising doctrine I currently DON'T agree with: Theonomy
Jan 17, 2023
auto_awesome
Joel Webbon, a theologian from Right Response Ministries, engages in a thought-provoking dialogue about Theonomy, emphasizing its biblical validity. They explore the significance of God's moral laws and the risks of antinomianism in modern evangelicalism. The conversation delves into the nuances of law versus love in scripture, the interplay between church and state, and how these principles influence contemporary governance. Webbon also discusses the implications of applying Theonomic principles while critiquing secular ideologies in moral decision-making.
The speaker argues that Theonomy, while presenting some positive aspects, fundamentally diverges from biblical foundations and carries potential dangers.
The importance of accurate biblical interpretation and hermeneutics is emphasized to prevent misapplication of God's law within Theonomy discussions.
Despite disagreements on Theonomy, fostering respectful dialogue and maintaining a brotherly tone among Christians is highlighted as essential for theological discussions.
Historical examples of Theonomy, particularly the case of Constantine, illustrate the complications and inconsistencies of aligning governance with biblical principles.
Deep dives
Understanding Theonomy
Theonomy is defined as the belief that God's law should govern all aspects of life, including civil governance. The speaker expresses concern about the potential dangers of Theonomy, suggesting that while not entirely negative, it diverges from biblical foundations and could lead to problems for its adherents. In exploring this concept, the speaker engages in a dialogue with Pastor Joel Webbin, a proponent of Theonomy, aiming to dissect its implications and scriptural basis. The conversation underscores that Theonomy advocates for societal structures where laws reflect the moral standards rooted in divine commandments.
The Role of Scripture
A significant portion of the discussion revolves around how scripture is interpreted and applied within the context of Theonomy. The speaker emphasizes the importance of understanding biblical proof texts correctly and warns against misinterpretation. Throughout the conversation, attention is given to the need for accurate hermeneutics, ensuring that the application of God's law is grounded in sound biblical exegesis. This insistence on scripture's role raises questions about how different interpretations can lead to diverse theological perspectives on God's law.
Brotherly Dialogue and Respectful Discourse
Despite the differences in beliefs, the speaker highlights the importance of maintaining a brotherly tone in discussions about theological disagreements. The speaker expresses appreciation for Pastor Webbin as a fellow believer, emphasizing the transcendent relationship shared among Christians, regardless of differing views on Theonomy. This theme underscores a commitment to healthy and respectful dialogue when confronting theological issues. Both parties strive to foster a family-like relationship, demonstrating that while they may disagree, their ultimate goal is to glorify God.
Historical Perspectives on Theonomy
The conversation touches upon historical instances where Theonomy might have manifested, particularly referencing figures like Constantine as a case study. The speaker points out that while there have been some attempts to align governance with biblical principles, these have often been fraught with complications and inconsistencies. Acknowledging how various periods of church history have seen fluctuating approaches to Theonomy helps contextualize its relevance today. This historical backdrop raises essential questions about the feasibility and implications of implementing Theonomy in contemporary society.
The Law's Role in Society
A significant point of contention is the application of God's law in modern governance, particularly as it relates to civil laws and moral conduct. The speaker posits that while the Ten Commandments hold moral significance for Christians, their enforcement at a governmental level remains debated. The discussion examines how principles from scripture can inform civil policies without creating a theocratic system. Furthermore, the speaker questions the practical implications of enforcing all commandments of God within political frameworks.
Judgment and Jurisdiction
The distinction between judging those within the church and those outside leads to further exploration of Theonomy's practical applications. The speaker highlights various texts, particularly from 1 Corinthians, that clarify the church's role and authority compared to the civil government's purview. By outlining the notion that God judges those outside the church, it crystallizes the divide in responsibilities between ecclesiastical governance and civil authority. This separation propounds a crucial understanding of how Christians can engage with culture without overstepping their biblical jurisdiction.
Christ’s Authority and the Great Commission
The Great Commission serves as a pivotal point in the conversation, emphasizing Jesus' command to make disciples of all nations. The speaker interprets this directive as a call to embed Christian values within societal structures, blending personal faith with public life. While supporting the idea of societal influence, concerns are raised about the potential conflation of binding government laws with church authority. The interpretation of the Great Commission prompts reflections on how Christians are to navigate their civic duties in light of Christ's teachings.
Contemporary Implications of Theonomy
The implications of Theonomy for modern governments stir debate about the viability of implementing such a framework in today’s context. The speaker argues that while there may be merit to striving for a society reflecting God’s moral law, practical execution remains complex and nuanced. The conversation delves into how historical examples can inform current thinking, while also recognizing the pushback against theocracy as a governing ideal. This exploration leads to reflections on individual and collective responsibilities as Christians engage in the public sphere.
After this rather long chat, I can say that I do have a lot to learn about theonomy to understand it better but that I am currently convinced that the core foundation of the view is not biblical. I consider this an in-house discussion, and one which we could disagree on without demonizing each other.
Special thanks to Joel Webbon of Right Response Ministries for inviting me to have this discussion and being willing to hear some pushback. CLICK HERE to visit pastor Joel's YT channel.
My website: https://BibleThinker.org
Get the Snipd podcast app
Unlock the knowledge in podcasts with the podcast player of the future.
AI-powered podcast player
Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features
Discover highlights
Listen to the best highlights from the podcasts you love and dive into the full episode
Save any moment
Hear something you like? Tap your headphones to save it with AI-generated key takeaways
Share & Export
Send highlights to Twitter, WhatsApp or export them to Notion, Readwise & more
AI-powered podcast player
Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features
Discover highlights
Listen to the best highlights from the podcasts you love and dive into the full episode
