
Developer Tea
Iteration or Target State Planning
Apr 24, 2025
Delve into the intriguing debate between iterative and target state planning in software development. Discover how iterative planning champions agility and quick responses to changes, while target state planning lays out a clear long-term vision. Explore the advantages of each approach, from handling uncertainty with agile methods to the structured direction of target planning. Learn key decision factors that can influence your choice and why sticking to a default method might signal trouble. This discussion offers valuable insights for effective project management.
15:29
AI Summary
AI Chapters
Episode notes
Podcast summary created with Snipd AI
Quick takeaways
- Iterative planning fosters agility and responsiveness to change in software development, making it ideal for uncertain environments and user feedback integration.
- Target state planning, while offering a clear long-term direction, is beneficial in situations with high regulatory risks and clear problem definitions.
Deep dives
Iterative Planning vs. Target State Planning
Iterative planning emphasizes the need for agility and adaptability in software development, allowing teams to respond quickly to changes and user feedback. In contrast, target state planning involves establishing a clear direction or goal for a project, which can help to constrain the subsequent work. While these approaches may seem contradictory, they can actually complement each other; target state planning can provide a framework within which teams can iterate and adapt as they learn more about user needs. Setting a target state allows teams to have a general direction while being open to making adjustments based on real-world insights gained during the development process.
Remember Everything You Learn from Podcasts
Save insights instantly, chat with episodes, and build lasting knowledge - all powered by AI.