Caveat
Looking to other countries when regulating AI.
Feb 8, 2024
Josh Harguess, AI Security Chief at Cranium, discusses AI regulation comparisons between the US and other regions. Topics include the NSA purchasing US internet data, concerns about privacy and oversight, the ongoing legal battles between big social media platforms and states, and a comparison of AI regulation efforts. The chapter also explores the recent EU AI Act and its focus on risk-based regulation.
49:40
Episode guests
AI Summary
AI Chapters
Episode notes
Podcast summary created with Snipd AI
Quick takeaways
- The EU has introduced the AI Act, which outlines high-risk uses of AI, including medical devices and education, and emphasizes transparency, documentation, copyrights, and penalties for non-compliance.
- The US has a decentralized approach to AI regulation, with each agency developing its own guidelines, while states like California lead the way in AI regulation, focusing on privacy and governance.
Deep dives
EU AI Act: High-risk uses and penalties
The EU has introduced the AI Act, which focuses on identifying high-risk uses of AI, such as medical devices and influencing elections. It also includes unexpected areas like education and HR. The Act emphasizes transparency requirements, documentation, copyrights, and safeguards. Non-compliance can result in penalties of up to $38 million or 7% global turnover.
Remember Everything You Learn from Podcasts
Save insights instantly, chat with episodes, and build lasting knowledge - all powered by AI.
