Selena Simmons-Duffin, health policy correspondent at NPR, discusses the challenges faced by women seeking abortion in Texas, including the recent Texas Supreme Court ruling, strict regulations, and absence of exemptions for rape and incest. She also highlights Kate Cox's personal experience and the contradictory nature of the abortion laws, as well as the implications of the court's ruling on medical exceptions and mandated grieving.
The Texas Supreme Court ruling against Kate Cox's abortion case highlights the limitations and challenges of abortion bans, especially in cases of fetal anomalies and health risks.
Texas's strict and intricate abortion laws create confusion and uncertainty for doctors, patients, and legal experts, with limited exceptions and multiple overlapping bans.
Deep dives
Kate Cox's Legal Battle for an Abortion
Kate Cox, a pregnant woman from Texas, found herself unable to have an abortion due to restrictive state laws. Despite having a fetus with a devastating diagnosis and facing potential health risks, Kate's options were limited. She decided to sue the state for the right to have an abortion. However, the Texas Supreme Court ruled against her, stating that her situation did not meet the requirements for a legal abortion. This case highlights the challenges and limitations of abortion bans, as well as the difficult position it puts doctors in.
The Complexity of Abortion Laws in Texas
Texas has stringent abortion laws that make the procedure illegal in most circumstances. The only exception is when the pregnant individual's life is at risk. These laws do not allow for exceptions in cases of rape, incest, or fetal anomalies. The intricacy of the laws, with multiple overlapping bans, creates confusion and uncertainty for doctors, patients, and legal experts. The recent case of Kate Cox sheds light on the ambiguities and difficulties in navigating the legal landscape surrounding abortion in Texas.
The Implications and Predicament for Doctors
Doctors in Texas face an impossible situation when it comes to providing abortion care. The laws are vague and open to interpretation, requiring doctors to make a reasonable medical judgment when determining if an abortion is necessary. However, this judgment can be challenged, leaving doctors vulnerable to lawsuits and penalties. Moreover, if doctors fail to intervene and complications arise, they could face malpractice suits. The case of Kate Cox underscores the immense pressure and impossible choices that doctors confront in Texas.
Kate Cox’s fight to abort her pregnancy and save her fertility in Texas says a lot about America’s post-Roe, fractured approach to reproductive rights.
If you enjoy this show, please consider signing up for Slate Plus. Slate Plus members get benefits like zero ads on any Slate podcast, bonus episodes of shows like Slow Burn and Dear Prudence—and you’ll be supporting the work we do here on What Next. Sign up now at slate.com/whatnextplus to help support our work.