
Next Comes What Why This Is Bigger Than Trump
Jan 8, 2026
This discussion launches into the implications of the recent U.S. actions in Venezuela, posing it as part of a larger national issue. It explores how oil interests and historical U.S. intervention shape current policies under Trump. Andrea highlights the dangers of a media landscape that enables authoritarianism and emphasizes voting alone won't undo systemic problems. The podcast also calls for reimagining governance and implementing evidence-based policies to restore public trust and counter billionaire influence.
AI Snips
Chapters
Books
Transcript
Episode notes
Intervention Is Historical Pattern
- The U.S. attack on Venezuela reflects long-standing priorities like oil control and anti-communism, not just Trump's whims.
- Andrea Pitzer argues the operation repeats a century of interventionist patterns shaping current policy.
Cuba's Security Role And 2002 Coup
- Pitzer recalls Cuba's longstanding role providing Maduro's personal security, linking it to reported Cuban casualties.
- She references the 2002 U.S.-backed coup attempt against Hugo Chávez as historical precedent.
Operation Lacks Clear Legal Basis
- The U.S. operation in Venezuela appears illegal under international law and violates sovereignty.
- Pitzer cites legal experts and UN statements condemning the action as a breach of the UN Charter.



