The discussion dives into New York Democrats' plans to ban masks in public transit, raising questions about social equity. North Carolina's controversial anti-mask bill is scrutinized, revealing its harsh impacts on marginalized communities. Legal implications around mask mandates are explored, particularly how ambiguous language can escalate violence. Historical contexts highlight past mask bans and their use in quelling dissent. The need for solidarity among social movements stands out as vital in navigating these political challenges.
The surge in anti-mask legislation, particularly in North Carolina, poses significant risks to public health and marginalized communities.
Historical anti-mask laws in New York reveal a legacy of using public safety concerns to suppress political dissent and activism.
Mask mandates are becoming symbols of resistance and solidarity, emphasizing the interconnectedness of health and social justice movements.
Deep dives
Support for Anti-Mask Legislation
There is a noticeable surge in anti-mask sentiment and legislation across various states in the United States, particularly in North Carolina. A recent bill aimed at limiting the wearing of masks in public has garnered support from lawmakers and is currently under consideration by the governor. Critics argue that this bill poses a significant risk to individuals, especially those who wear masks for health reasons, as it removes existing exemptions. The bill's implications extend beyond mere mask-wearing, contributing to a growing culture of intimidation against those seeking to protect themselves and raising concerns about arbitrary enforcement against marginalized communities.
Concerns Over Legal Definitions and Enforcement
The new legal language regarding mask enforcement raises serious concerns about who is considered an 'occupant' of a property and how this could lead to arbitrary and discriminatory practices. The lack of clarity in definitions could empower individuals or law enforcement to misinterpret the law and remove masks from individuals without adequate reason. Furthermore, the amendments to the bill suggest a shift in focus from public health to increased surveillance and control, particularly targeting public spaces such as transportation systems. This ambiguity not only jeopardizes public safety but also sets a dangerous precedent for how laws can discriminate against vulnerable populations.
Historical Context of Anti-Mask Laws
New York's longstanding anti-mask laws have deep historical roots tied to the suppression of political dissent, dating back to the labor movements of the 1800s. The recent push for more stringent mask bans echoes this legacy, as politicians leverage public safety concerns to stifle activism and protest. Figures like Mayor Eric Adams have drawn problematic comparisons between masked individuals at protests and criminals, further stigmatizing those who occupy marginalized identities. This reflects a broader strategy to characterize dissent as lawlessness, undermining legitimate efforts for social change and rendering marginalized communities more vulnerable.
Impact on Accessibility and Public Health
Mandating mask bans has profound implications for accessibility, particularly in public transit systems where individuals depend on masks for protection against contagious diseases. The potential return of mask bans in New York could exacerbate existing accessibility challenges, making the subway system more hostile to immunocompromised individuals. Moreover, the legislation does not adequately account for other health conditions that necessitate mask-wearing, effectively excluding broad categories of individuals from using public transit safely. This raises critical questions about public health policies that prioritize punitive measures over inclusivity and safety for all.
The Role of Solidarity in Resistance
The movement for mask-wearing as a form of solidarity against systemic injustice is positioning masks not just as health measures but as symbols of resistance. Opposition to renewed anti-mask laws showcases the interconnectedness of various social justice movements, including health and disability justice, as well as Palestinian solidarity. Organizations and individuals must work collaboratively to push back against the narrative that equates masking with criminality and oppression. By fostering solidarity and unity among those impacted by these laws, movements can counteract attempts to fracture their collective power and discourage dissent.
Beatrice, Artie and Phil discuss New York Democrats’ plan to ban masks on the subway and beyond, and take a close look at the latest updates on North Carolina’s anti-mask bill HB237, “Unmasking Mobs and Criminals,” which state lawmakers managed to make significantly worse since we last talked about it on the show at the end of May.
Transcript: www.deathpanel.net/transcripts/rise-of-mask-bans
Find our book Health Communism here: www.versobooks.com/books/4081-health-communism
Find Jules' new book, A Short History of Trans Misogyny, here:
https://www.versobooks.com/products/3054-a-short-history-of-trans-misogyny
Death Panel merch here (patrons get a discount code): www.deathpanel.net/merch
As always, support Death Panel at www.patreon.com/deathpanelpod
Get the Snipd podcast app
Unlock the knowledge in podcasts with the podcast player of the future.
AI-powered podcast player
Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features
Discover highlights
Listen to the best highlights from the podcasts you love and dive into the full episode
Save any moment
Hear something you like? Tap your headphones to save it with AI-generated key takeaways
Share & Export
Send highlights to Twitter, WhatsApp or export them to Notion, Readwise & more
AI-powered podcast player
Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features
Discover highlights
Listen to the best highlights from the podcasts you love and dive into the full episode