Explore the evolution of dental bonding systems, advancements in composite behavior, and the importance of bonding strength in dental composites. Discover how visualizing molecular movement during polymerization can lead to more predictable bonds and successful restorations.
Visualization of polymerization flow aids in creating predictable bonds in enamel substrates.
Configuration factor (C-factor) impacts stress distribution in composite restorations during polymerization.
Deep dives
Evolution of Dental Bonding Systems
The podcast delves into the evolution of dental bonding systems from the introduction of Clear-Fill F1 in 1978, marking a shift in adhesive dentistry by enabling tooth-colored fillings. The discussion highlights the significant developments in bonding to enamel and dentin, underscoring the importance of integrating techniques for biomac restorations. Through literature reviews and references, the episode explores foundational articles that laid the groundwork for understanding composite polymerization dynamics.
Exploring Polymerization Stress in Composites
The podcast reviews studies on polymerization stress in composites, focusing on experiments conducted by Carol Davidson's team in Amsterdam. The researchers developed unique apparatuses to measure polymerization shrinkage stress in composites, revealing insights into the molecular movement and cross-linking processes during polymerization. The concept of free flow condition, where molecules move towards each other without being bonded to the container, explains stress relief in early polymerization stages of composites.
Impact of Bonding Configuration on Stress Distribution
The episode discusses the concept of configuration factor (C-factor) and its influence on stress distribution in bonded restorations. Through experiments with different bonding conditions, researchers observed that the ratio of bonded to unbonded surfaces affected stress levels during polymerization. The research emphasized the significance of bonded surfaces in reducing stress, leading to insights into optimizing bonding techniques for minimizing stresses in composite restorations.
We are able to visualize how molecules move during polymerization thanks to the work of Carel L Davidson in the 1980s. Being able to visualize and then measure this movement, also known as flow, helps create more predictable bonds when working with different substrates in enamel, but Dr. David Alleman took years to systematize this concept into his practice as he was developing his concept of Decoupling with Time.
Articles referenced in this episode:
Alleman DS. Decoupling with time. A solution to the problem of the hierarchy of bondability. Inside Dent. 2021;August: 35-41
Fusayama T. A Simple Pain-Free Adhesive Restorative System by Minimal Reduction and Total Etching. 2nd Edition. Ishiyaku EuroAmerica, Inc.; 1993
Davidson CL, de Gee AJ. Relaxation of polymerization contraction stresses by flow in dental composites. J Dent Res. 1984: 146-148
Davidson CL, de Gee AJ, Feilzer A. The competition between the composite-dentin bond strength and the polymerization contraction stress. J Dent Res. 1984;63(12): 1396-1399
Feilzer A, de Gee AJ, Davidson CL. Setting stress in composite resin in relation to configuration of the restoration. J Dent Res. 1987;66(11): 1636-1639
Kemp-Sholte CM, Davidson, CL. Complete marginal seal of Class V resin composite restorations effected by increased flexibility. J Dent Res. 1990 Jun;69(6):1240-3.
Lu H, Stansbury JW, Bowman CN. Towards the elucidation of shrinkage stress development and relaxation in dental composites. Dent. Mater. 2004;20: 979-986
Nikolaenko SA, Et al. Influence of c-factor and layering technique on microtensile bond strength to dentin. Dent. Mater. 2004;20-579-585