Think from KERA Unpacking the Donroe Doctrine
Jan 21, 2026
Joshua Keating, a senior correspondent at Vox specializing in foreign policy, joins to discuss the 'Donroe Doctrine'—Trump's assertion of U.S. intervention rights in Latin America. Keating explains the historical roots in the Monroe Doctrine and contrasts Trump's strategies with previous administrations. He uncovers contradictions in U.S. actions, including military escalations and political motives behind interventions, and evaluates their long-term impacts. Finally, Keating warns of potential backfires, including damaged alliances and rising nationalism.
AI Snips
Chapters
Transcript
Episode notes
Monroe Doctrine Evolved Into Regional Preeminence
- The Monroe Doctrine began as a warning against European recolonization of the Americas.
- Over time it morphed into U.S. regional preeminence and occasional military intervention.
Venezuela Fits A Historical Pattern
- Between 1898 and 1994 the U.S. repeatedly intervened in its hemisphere, including about 17 successful regime changes.
- What happened in Venezuela fits a long historical pattern of U.S. action in Latin America.
Narrative Built Before Military Action
- The U.S. built up substantial military assets near Venezuela while framing Maduro as linked to drug trafficking.
- Actions like designating groups as terrorists helped build a narrative that justified kinetic measures.