

What next for the trans debate?
Apr 16, 2025

Guest
Max Anderson

Guest
Angela Knight

Guest
Al Pinkerton

Guest
Scarlett Maguire

Guest
Frida Wallace

Guest
Joanna Cherry
Joanna Cherry, a barrister and former SNP MP, joins Frida Wallace, a passionate trans activist, for a compelling discussion about the significant Supreme Court ruling on gender definitions. Political commentator Scarlett Maguire and Lib Dem MP Al Pinkerton weigh in on the ruling’s implications for trans rights and women's safety. Former MP Angela Knight adds depth to the conversation about the evolving landscape of LGBTQ+ rights, while Max Anderson discusses the intersection of these social issues with environmental and economic pressures, prompting a thought-provoking dialogue.
AI Snips
Chapters
Transcript
Episode notes
Supreme Court Defines Woman by Biology
- The Supreme Court ruled that under the Equality Act, 'woman' and 'sex' refer to biological sex, not gender identity.
- This legal clarification affects policies on single-sex spaces and has implications for transgender rights and women’s privacy.
Judgment Protects Biological Sex Rights
- The Supreme Court judgment confirms sex-based rights protect biological women and does not roll back trans rights under gender reassignment protections.
- Lesbians’ rights to associate based on biological sex have been vindicated by this clarified legal definition.
Trans Activist Faces Post-Ruling Hate
- Trans activist Frida Wallace receives online hate following the ruling, feeling socially unsupported despite legal protections.
- She highlights personal and community impacts beyond legal changes, including increased social hostility.