Episode 132 - *Journalism intensifies* (FT. Alan MacLeod)
May 24, 2024
01:26:51
auto_awesome Snipd AI
Journalism expert Alan MacLeod discusses challenges facing alternative media, biased reporting on Gaza by mainstream outlets like The New York Times, and ties between big tech companies and intelligence agencies. The podcast explores themes of censorship, government influence, and the impact of former CIA agents on content moderation.
Read more
AI Summary
AI Chapters
Episode notes
auto_awesome
Podcast summary created with Snipd AI
Quick takeaways
The New York Times criticized for biased reporting on Gaza, censoring key terms and favoring US narratives.
Allegations of US-ISIS ties spark controversy, questioning ISIS motives and allegiance in the Middle East.
Journalists face emotional challenges covering traumatic content, emphasizing need for proactive coping strategies and purpose.
Deep dives
Deception and Misinformation in Media Coverage
The New York Times has faced criticism for its deceptive and misleading coverage of the situation in Gaza, with headlines minimizing Palestinian deaths and censoring crucial terms like 'genocide' or 'ethnic cleansing'. The publication has been accused of serving as a mouthpiece for the US national security state, influencing public opinion in line with US interests. Leaked memos reveal editorial directives to sanitize reporting on Palestine, highlighting a pattern of biased reporting favoring Israeli narratives.
US Involvement with ISIS
The relationship between the US and ISIS has sparked controversy, with allegations of ISIS serving as a proxy for US interests in the Middle East. Leaders in the region have linked ISIS to US agendas, pointing to past instances of US support for conservative Islamic groups. Suspicious attacks by ISIS against US adversaries like Russia raise questions about the nature of their true allegiance and motives, fueling speculation about covert ties and strategic manipulation.
Challenge of Addressing Traumatic Content
Professional journalists face the challenge of engaging with traumatic content on a regular basis, balancing the need to report on atrocities while maintaining emotional resilience. The exposure to graphic images and distressing news can lead to feelings of anger and helplessness. Finding proactive ways to channel these emotions, such as through advocacy, awareness-raising, or investigative journalism, can provide a sense of purpose and drive for journalists addressing difficult subject matter.
US Support for Extremist Groups
Historically, the US has backed various extremist groups and militias in regions like Afghanistan, promoting radical agendas for geopolitical leverage. The intricate relationship between US policies and extremist factions highlights a pattern of strategic alliances that serve short-term interests but often lead to unintended consequences. The covert backing of movements like ISIS raises ethical and political concerns about the impact of such alliances on global stability and security.
The Regulation on Terminology Use in Reporting
Media outlets were directed to avoid using the term 'ceasefire' during discussions of the conflict, with a Canadian official awkwardly avoiding the word in favor of 'cease hostilities' due to directives discouraging the term.
Media Bias in Coverage of Retaliation by Iran
The podcast highlighted the disparity in media coverage on Iran's retaliation, with initial claims of intercepting 99% of drones being reduced to 25%. The disproportionate spending of the US and Israel in response to a relatively inexpensive attack raised eyebrows, showcasing the biased narrative that overlooks provocative actions by Western nations.
You are listening to this episode 1 week after it was released. To get episodes on time check out our Patreon! Episode 133 - BOY BOY is already available there: https://www.patreon.com/TheDeprogram