Center for AI Policy Podcast #9: Kelsey Piper on the OpenAI Exit Documents Incident
Jul 5, 2024
Kelsey Piper, a Senior Writer at Vox known for her insights on tech and policy, dives into the OpenAI exit documents incident. She discusses how OpenAI's restrictive exit agreements impact transparency and employee expression. The pressure tactics used to suppress criticism and the complexities surrounding their equity structure reveal ethical dilemmas. Kelsey emphasizes the urgency for proactive policy engagement in AI, urging a closer examination of the risks and clear communication within the community. A compelling look at the intersection of corporate governance and tech ethics!
AI Snips
Chapters
Transcript
Episode notes
Broad Lifetime Non-Disparagement Clauses
- OpenAI's exit agreements included lifetime non-disparagement clauses and bans on acknowledging the agreement's existence.
- These broad provisions restricted even truthful public criticisms and created significant legal and ethical issues.
Pressure and Criticism Sensitivity
- OpenAI exerted strong pressure to force former employees to sign exit agreements threatening loss of vested equity.
- The company appeared extremely sensitive to criticism, aiming to silence even mild public dissent.
OpenAI's Unique Equity Structure
- OpenAI employees receive profit participation units as equity, representing potential future payouts.
- These units are central to employee compensation and can be worth millions if the company succeeds.