AI-powered
podcast player
Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features
The speaker discusses the concept of skepticism and how it relates to the distinction between dreams and reality. While there may be some differences between the two, the speaker argues that they are not significant enough to rule out the possibility that our experiences are part of the same kind of existence.
The concept of extended mind is explored, which suggests that cognitive states can extend beyond the confines of the brain. The speaker discusses how objects like notebooks can become part of the mind, aiding in cognitive processes. However, there is a limit to the extension of the mind, and the body itself plays a crucial role in shaping our mental experiences.
The speaker leans towards an instrumentalist view of scientific theories, suggesting that they serve as useful tools for predicting, systematizing, and controlling observable phenomena. While acknowledging the importance of underlying regularities, the speaker believes that scientific theories provide instrumental success rather than an ultimate understanding of truth.
The conversation delves into the relationship between science and engineering. It is argued that science often focuses on creating practical and predictive models and equations, while engineering applies these models to create useful outcomes. The distinction is made between the physics as an engineering-oriented discipline and biology as a more comprehensive exploration of nature.
Mathematics plays a crucial role in understanding the world through its ability to describe and predict phenomena. However, the applicability of mathematics to real-world situations often requires simplifications and idealizations. By abstracting from specific details, mathematics can provide powerful tools for modeling and making predictions, as seen in the example of using differential equations to describe the behavior of a pendulum. It is important to recognize that while mathematical models can be highly successful in certain contexts, they are not always exact representations of the underlying reality.
Defining knowledge is a complex task that has puzzled philosophers for centuries. Traditionally, knowledge was defined as justified true belief, where one believes something that is true and is justified in holding that belief. However, the idea of justification is itself difficult to pin down, leading to ongoing debates. It is also challenging to determine what counts as the criteria for truth and how we can establish the correspondence of our beliefs with reality. These issues highlight the inherent complexity of defining knowledge and the diverse perspectives people hold on what can be considered as true.
The practice of science is influenced by various factors, including institutional structures, biases, and external pressures. While science aims to be an objective pursuit of knowledge, external influences can impact the process and dissemination of scientific findings. For example, the COVID-19 pandemic demonstrated how political and economic considerations can shape the communication and interpretation of scientific information. The complex interplay between state, corporate, and scientific interests raises questions about the objectivity and trustworthiness of scientific institutions. It is essential to critically evaluate scientific claims and scrutinize the underlying motivations and potential biases behind them.
Anti-realism can be seen as an escapist method to avoid personal responsibility. It questions the structural explanations for consciousness and promotes the idea that nothing is real. This can lead to a lack of accountability for one's actions. However, the anti-realist perspective also highlights the importance of hard work, creativity, and imagination in scientific endeavors. Success is not solely determined by discovering the truth, but rather by the inventiveness and constructive efforts of scientists.
The future of science and its potential for radical changes is uncertain. While there have been historical revolutions that completely transformed our worldview, it is plausible that we may have reached a point of fewer radical shifts. The increasing systematization and hyper-specialization of science may contribute to a more fixed current worldview. However, the focus on interpreting scientific equations and exploring nuances may shape future scientific breakthroughs and technological advancements. Finding middle ground between opposing viewpoints on complex issues, such as climate change, can be challenging. Compromises require understanding various perspectives and building coalitions to implement effective solutions while considering the wider impacts of our choices.
@KaneB is a public philosopher who focuses on the philosophy of science, the source of knowledge, and the construction of beliefs. We discuss the nature of reality, how it’s possible to justify knowledge, the source of conspiracies, skepticism as a philosophical lifestyle, the difficulty of knowing if we’re really alive or if we’re just a brain in a vat, and if it’s really that difficult to evaluate if we’re living in a dream or not. 00:00:00 Go! 00:00:17 Who is Kane Baker? 00:01:58 What's left in Philosophy 00:06:14 Gap in physics and philosophy 00:12:51 Condensing ideas & transforming scales of ideas 00:18:39 Choosing Beliefs 00:20:46 Patreon Ask 00:24:44 Brains in vats? 00:29:58 Observation, knowledge, & simulations 00:35:33 Dreaming coherence 00:45:35 Philosophy of Mind 00:50:53 Zombies 00:53:06 Epistemology of the academe 01:04:58 Water off a Duck's Back 01:18:35 Ideal Claims 01:27:23 Math as Language 01:32:31 End of Inquiry 01:39:42 Realists, Antirealists & Synthesists 01:47:26 Science as Interrelation 01:54:10 Why Bother? 02:01:27 Laying Blame 02:10:00 The right knob to twist 02:22:12 Philosophers argue for everything 02:30:00 Closing thoughts Support the scientific revolution by joining our Patreon: https://bit.ly/3lcAasB Tell us what you think in the comments or on our Discord: https://discord.gg/MJzKT8CQub #philosophyofscience #philosophy #skepticism #truebeliefs #epistemology #knowledge Check our short-films channel, @DemystifySci: https://www.youtube.com/c/DemystifyingScience AND our material science investigations of atomics, @MaterialAtomics https://www.youtube.com/@MaterialAtomics Join our mailing list https://bit.ly/3v3kz2S PODCAST INFO: Anastasia completed her PhD studying bioelectricity at Columbia University. When not talking to brilliant people or making movies, she spends her time painting, reading, and guiding backcountry excursions. Shilo also did his PhD at Columbia studying the elastic properties of molecular water. When he's not in the film studio, he's exploring sound in music. They are both freelance professors at various universities. - Blog: http://DemystifySci.com/blog - RSS: https://anchor.fm/s/2be66934/podcast/rss - Donate: https://bit.ly/3wkPqaD - Swag: https://bit.ly/2PXdC2y SOCIAL: - Discord: https://discord.gg/MJzKT8CQub - Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/groups/DemystifySci - Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/DemystifySci/ - Twitter: https://twitter.com/DemystifySci MUSIC: -Shilo Delay: https://g.co/kgs/oty671
Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features
Listen to the best highlights from the podcasts you love and dive into the full episode
Hear something you like? Tap your headphones to save it with AI-generated key takeaways
Send highlights to Twitter, WhatsApp or export them to Notion, Readwise & more
Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features
Listen to the best highlights from the podcasts you love and dive into the full episode