Gavel Gavel Lively v. Baldoni 11 - "But the Times Did Not Care"
9 snips
May 21, 2025 A deep dive into the legal battle against the New York Times reveals complex defamation challenges faced by plaintiffs from Wayfair. The discussion critiques journalistic integrity, especially regarding a controversial article's timing. Media manipulation and the role of celebrity allegations are explored, exposing how narratives shift in the public eye. The hosts analyze communication intricacies while hinting at the dramatic legal narratives to come, keeping listeners eagerly awaiting emoji revelations.
AI Snips
Chapters
Transcript
Episode notes
Libel Claim Challenges
- To succeed in a libel claim against The New York Times, plaintiffs must prove actual malice, a high bar given their perfect libel case record since 1964.
- California's anti-SLAPP laws make filing here risky for plaintiffs due to possible attorney fee liabilities.
Sinister Words Mask Normal Journalism
- Complaints often use sinister language for normal journalistic practices to make them seem improper.
- Working quietly with sources over weeks and coordinating publication timing are standard and legal journalistic processes.
Misunderstood Legal Proceedings
- The complaint wrongly claims Blake Lively's choice not to sue avoids discovery, showing a misunderstanding of legal timing.
- Filing a CRD complaint doesn't equate to or avoid legal proceedings or discovery in typical timing.