

Disney’s F.C.C. Fear Factor
Sep 19, 2025
Disney's puzzling choice to sideline Jimmy Kimmel under FCC pressure sparks a debate on media freedom and corporate integrity. The conversation takes a fascinating turn as the hosts explore public reactions and the implications for creative expression. They lighten the mood with a fun draft of media personalities, showcasing the stakes for industry leaders. The discussion also touches on The New York Times' subscription strategies and innovative plans involving AI and sports content, revealing how traditional media is adapting to new challenges.
AI Snips
Chapters
Transcript
Episode notes
Capitulation Risks Corporate Reputation
- Disney preempting Jimmy Kimmel amid FCC pressure signals a larger threat to media independence.
- The move risks creating long-term brand and talent damage that outweighs short-term legal or regulatory gains.
Creative Community Remembers Past Capitulations
- Disney's James Gunn reversal a decade ago showed the creative community can punish perceived capitulation.
- Repeating similar deference to outside pressure now risks alienating talent and harming long-term creative relationships.
Pressure, Not The Comment, Drove The Decision
- The hosts argue Disney acted because of FCC and Nexstar pressure, not solely Kimmel's remarks.
- That provenance matters because government-influenced corporate decisions set a dangerous precedent for free expression.