Delve into Washington's ambitious cap-and-trade system aimed at reducing carbon emissions. Hear personal stories of individuals navigating this new climate policy landscape. Explore the economic and political implications, including revenue generation and public reactions to rising gas prices. Discover the controversies surrounding cap and trade and the skepticism it faces from influential hedge fund managers. The stakes are high; this experiment could reshape climate policy across the U.S. or serve as a cautionary tale if it falters.
Washington's cap-and-trade system aims to drastically reduce carbon emissions through market-driven mechanisms, generating significant revenue while facing political challenges.
The success or failure of Washington's initiative could influence other states to adopt similar climate policies, making the political landscape crucial for its future.
Deep dives
The Economic Perspective on Climate Change
Economists view climate change as a classic economic problem characterized by market failure, where polluters do not fully bear the costs of their actions. This disconnect leads to the suggestion that raising the price of carbon emissions, primarily through mechanisms like carbon taxes or cap-and-trade systems, could incentivize better behavioral choices. A carbon tax is often advocated by economists, although it faces political challenges due to the unpopularity of new taxes. In contrast, cap-and-trade systems appeal to policymakers since they avoid explicitly labeling costs as taxes, thus providing an alternative to regulate emissions while allowing market dynamics to dictate pricing.
Washington's Cap-and-Trade Experiment
Washington State enacted a cap-and-trade system aimed at significantly reducing carbon emissions, with ambitious targets to cut emissions by nearly half by 2030 and 95% by 2050. Luke Martland, who took on this initiative, faced the challenge of turning legislation into actionable policy within an expedited timeframe. The state’s plan involves issuing permits to businesses, limiting total carbon emissions, and allowing companies to trade these permits, thereby creating a financial incentive to reduce emissions. The political landscape surrounding this initiative is critical; its success or failure could influence other states considering similar policies.
Impacts and Political Reactions to the New System
The implementation of Washington's cap-and-trade program led to significant revenue generation for the state, raising approximately $1.8 billion from carbon auctions while positioning itself as a 'cap and invest' strategy. However, this increase in costs has also resulted in rising gas prices, drawing political backlash from opponents who view it as a tax in disguise. Critics argue that this system disproportionately burdens consumers while questioning its overall effectiveness in addressing global emissions. As the state navigates these challenges, upcoming public votes will determine whether Washington will continue with this pioneering initiative.
Recently, the state of Washington embarked on an ambitious new plan to combat climate change. Taking a page from economics textbooks, the state instituted a statewide "cap and trade" system for carbon emissions. The state establishes a cap on the total amount of carbon pollution it is willing to allow each year, and then gives away or auctions off carbon emission permits that add up to that total. Companies can then trade those permits on the open market.
Economists love cap and trade plans because they establish a limit on carbon emissions while letting the market find the most efficient way for decarbonization to occur. But cap and trade has had a hard time catching on, especially in the U.S.
The stakes are high for Washington's new plan. If it succeeds, it could convince other states to implement their own versions, but if it fails, it might serve as a cautionary tale. On today's show, we take a look at how Washington's grand experiment with cap and trade is faring.
This episode was hosted by Keith Romer and Kenny Malone. It was produced by Emma Peaslee and edited by Emily Siner. It was fact checked by Sierra Juarez and engineered by Valentina Rodriguez Sanchez. Alex Goldmark is Planet Money's executive producer.