Pablo Torre, host of "Pablo Torre Finds Out" and a savvy sports correspondent, joins to explore the snubbing of Jalen Hurts at the White House. They dive into the reluctance of black players to be used as political props, contrasting with Saquon Barkley's attendance. The duo humorously critiques how sports and politics intertwine, discussing shifting allegiances among team owners in relation to Trump. Torre also reflects on America's disillusionment amid economic decline, while jokingly examining Trump's take on the 'tush push' football tactic.
Jalen Hurts and other prominent Eagles players consciously opted out of the White House visit to distance themselves from political exploitation.
Saquon Barkley's attendance at a golf outing with Trump raises questions about transactional motives versus genuine political alignment in sports.
Deep dives
Jalen Hurts' Notable Absence
Jalen Hurts, the Philadelphia Eagles' quarterback and MVP candidate, notably did not attend the White House visit with the team, a decision that was shared by several other key players and highlights a significant sentiment among the team's starters. The absence of many prominent black athletes from the event, including A.J. Brown and Devontae Smith, reflects a conscious choice to distance themselves from the political implications of the visit and avoid being used as a prop by the Trump administration. This collective snub raises questions about how athletes perceive their roles amidst the shifting landscape of sports and politics, particularly in relation to their identity and values. Their decision suggests a desire to reject the endorsement of a presidency they may not support, highlighting the intersection of sports, celebrity, and social responsibility.
Saquon Barkley's Golf Outing
Saquon Barkley’s choice to attend a golf outing with Donald Trump prior to the Eagles' White House visit sparked speculation regarding his political affiliations and motivations. Trump's public praise for Barkley, contrasted with the absence of other Eagles athletes, sets a curious narrative around Barkley – a star running back known for his athletic prowess, now entwined with political spectacle. His participation raises questions about whether his interaction with Trump was merely transactional, aiming to capitalize on potential financial benefits rather than aligning with any ideological stance. This episode illustrates how the intertwining of sports and politics can complicate athletes' public images and the perceptions of their engagement in social issues.
The Moral Landscape of Team Ownership
The discussion around Eagles owner Jeffrey Lurie reveals a complex dynamic concerning sports team ownership and their relationships with political figures. Lurie previously did not attend the White House event in 2018 due to concerns about support for what many viewed as a controversial presidency, yet he now appears more willing to engage with the current administration. This shift may reflect a broader trend among affluent individuals navigating their public personas and business interests in a politically charged environment. The moral implications of mixing business with political relationships suggest that many owners might prioritize financial stability over principled stances, prompting deeper reflections about governance and ethics in professional sports.
Not everyone showed up when Trump welcomed the Eagles to the White House. Tim Miller and Pablo Torre talk about Jalen Hurts, Saquon Barkley, and the deeper political drama behind the scenes.
Remember Everything You Learn from Podcasts
Save insights instantly, chat with episodes, and build lasting knowledge - all powered by AI.
