The NPR Politics Podcast States Tell SCOTUS That Social Media Censors Conservatives
6 snips
Feb 27, 2024 The Supreme Court is facing a pivotal case on free speech regarding social media regulations. Texas and Florida argue for political speech protections, sparking debates over censorship and the First Amendment. The discussion highlights the tension between conservative and pro-Palestinian voices on social platforms. Philosophically, the podcast examines whether social media are publishers or mere platforms. It also navigates the complexities of regulating these tech giants, considering implications for content moderation and corporate influence.
AI Snips
Chapters
Transcript
Episode notes
Social Media Censorship Case
- Texas and Florida argue that social media companies censor conservative viewpoints.
- These states aim to prevent platforms from banning users based on expressed viewpoints and demand explanations for removed posts.
Censorship Claims Across the Spectrum
- Both conservative and pro-Palestinian voices have criticized social media platforms.
- They claim their views are being suppressed or not given equal weight, like through shadow banning.
Kavanaugh's First Amendment Focus
- Justice Kavanaugh strongly defended social media platforms' free speech rights.
- He highlighted that the First Amendment concerns government restrictions, not private companies' actions.