FT News Briefing
Swamp Notes: Election denialism is still in style
Oct 19, 2024
Eva Xiao, a data journalist at the Financial Times, and Joe Miller, the U.S. legal correspondent, dive into the ongoing specter of election denialism as the 2024 presidential race looms. They unpack how Trump and his allies are casting doubt on future votes, while exploring the surge in litigation from right-wing groups aimed at electoral integrity. The discussion also highlights the challenges of misinformation in a decentralized election system and examines positive changes in voting practices catalyzed by COVID-19.
16:05
Episode guests
AI Summary
AI Chapters
Episode notes
Podcast summary created with Snipd AI
Quick takeaways
- Trump and his allies are actively employing legal strategies to cast doubt on election integrity, impacting public perception despite lack of evidence.
- Election officials are reinforcing voter security and transparency through local engagement and updated electoral procedures to combat ongoing distrust.
Deep dives
The Roots of Election Doubt
Donald Trump's challenge to the 2020 election results began prior to the election, planting seeds of doubt about the electoral process. After the election, Trump's team filed over 60 lawsuits in various states, alleging numerous forms of voter fraud, although most were ultimately dismissed due to a lack of evidence. This created significant chaos and uncertainty around the election. The emphasis on unverified allegations by Trump and his allies highlights the effectiveness of sowing distrust, which continues to be employed as tactics leading up to the upcoming election.
Remember Everything You Learn from Podcasts
Save insights instantly, chat with episodes, and build lasting knowledge - all powered by AI.
