Climate Change on Trial

Ep. 12 | Mann at War

4 snips
Feb 6, 2024
In this explosive episode, the DC defamation trial of Mark Stein continues with devastating developments for Michael Mann. The judge criticizes Mann's case as disjointed and questions the purpose of witnesses. Dr. Judith Curry describes the devastation of her professional life due to Mann's smearing. Evidence suggests a whitewash of Mann's scientific misconduct investigation, and Steve McIntyre's enduring criticism of the hockey stick graph is highlighted. Don't miss this explosive testimony!
Ask episode
AI Snips
Chapters
Transcript
Episode notes
INSIGHT

Judge Calls Mann's Case Disjointed

  • Judge Irving criticized Michael Mann's case as disjointed and questioned the relevance of key witnesses, signaling judicial skepticism.
  • That critique tightened the trial schedule and highlighted weaknesses in Mann's presentation.
ANECDOTE

Curry Tried To Calm Climategate Firestorm

  • Judith Curry described how she publicly pushed for transparency after Climategate and tried to calm the escalating debate.
  • Her essays called for data openness, method transparency, and respectful disagreement.
ANECDOTE

Huffington Post Label Devastated Curry's Career

  • Curry testified that a Huffington Post article labeled her a "serial climate disinformer" and destroyed her academic prospects.
  • She said the label appeared widely in Google results and made her unemployable in academia.
Get the Snipd Podcast app to discover more snips from this episode
Get the app