Everything Hertz 186: Evaluating journal quality
20 snips
Nov 13, 2024 Explore a Nordic framework for assessing journal quality, focusing on the importance of credible evaluation methods. Dive into the complexities and potential pitfalls of popular academic publishers, while gaining valuable tips for undergraduates on discernment in journal selection. Enjoy a quirky quiz that humorously contrasts journal titles with random objects and reminisce on personal journeys through the academic landscape. The hosts reflect on the evolution of their views towards research credibility, combining insightful discussion with lighthearted banter.
AI Snips
Chapters
Transcript
Episode notes
Journal Classification Systems
- Scandinavian countries have systems for classifying journals by levels (0, 1, or 2).
- These levels have been linked to funding, hiring, and promotion decisions.
Mixed Experiences with Frontiers and MDPI
- James Heathers sought feedback on Frontiers and MDPI journals, finding diverse opinions.
- Some researchers had positive experiences, while others had negative ones, highlighting the complexity of journal quality.
Social Media Poll on Journal Quality
- A tweet about Frontiers and MDPI journals received significant engagement, revealing mixed experiences.
- This highlighted the need for nuanced evaluation beyond publisher labels.