Cryosphere Podcast Is Cryonics a Pseudoscience? - Ariel Zeleznikow-Johnston
May 31, 2025
Ariel Zeleznikow-Johnston, a research fellow at Monash University and author of *The Future Loves You*, dives into the controversial realm of cryonics. She discusses why she labels cryonics as 'pseudoscience' and explores its societal perceptions. The conversation includes insights on biostasis, memory retention in preserved brains, and complex ideas of identity and consciousness. Ariel also touches on public attitudes towards life extension and the emotional and ethical dilemmas surrounding digital copies of ourselves. It's a thought-provoking discussion on the future of life and death.
AI Snips
Chapters
Books
Transcript
Episode notes
Cryonics Viewed As Pseudoscience
- Ariel Zeleznikow-Johnston criticizes historical cryonics as pseudoscience and compares it to a cult and snake oil salesmen.
- He advocates for more scientifically rigorous methods like vitrification with stronger medical community support for preservation and revival.
Modern Cryonics Practices Are Scientific
- Cryonics is not inherently pseudoscience if practitioners seek data, validation, and adapt methods from evidence.
- Alcor and others conduct detailed scans and monitoring to improve cryopreservation practices scientifically.
Biostasis is More Inclusive Term
- The term 'biostasis' is preferable to 'cryonics' because it is more neutral and inclusive of various preservation techniques.
- 'Cryonics' carries negative baggage, so biostasis helps attract a broader, more open-minded audience.
