

How Gregg Wallace allegations cross the line
Dec 2, 2024
The discussion kicks off with young people's surprising reasons for declining job offers and a social media saga involving a TV presenter facing allegations. It highlights the blurred lines between humor and acceptable conduct, particularly in workplace dynamics. The conversation dives into themes of misogyny, using analogies to underline societal risks, while emphasizing the vital role of trade unions in supporting victims of harassment. The broader ramifications of political pardons, judicial independence, and public trust in policing are also critically examined.
Chapters
Transcript
Episode notes
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
Intro
00:00 • 2min
Navigating Humor and Boundaries in Society
01:53 • 13min
Navigating Allegations and Accountability
14:44 • 19min
Challenging Misogyny Through Analogies
34:06 • 2min
Empowerment Through Union Support
35:39 • 14min
Biden's Pardon: Political Implications and Accountability
49:23 • 5min
The Threat to Democracy and Complicity in Power Dynamics
54:11 • 2min
Father's Pardon: A Political Reflection
56:27 • 26min
Presidential Pardons and Political Ethics
01:22:31 • 6min
Judicial Independence and Political Power Dynamics
01:28:59 • 2min
Post-Trump Political Landscape
01:30:51 • 4min
Trust in Policing: A European Perspective
01:35:19 • 25min
Navigating Police Responses in a Digital Age
01:59:50 • 12min
Trust Betrayed: Encounters with Law Enforcement
02:12:07 • 11min
Perception of Policing in the Viral Age
02:22:51 • 2min