Bad Faith

Episode 424 Promo - Democratic Alternative (w/ Michael Eric Dyson)

Nov 18, 2024

Michael Eric Dyson delves into the complexities of voting for Democrats, specifically Kamala Harris, pointing out the urgent need for party reform. The discussion highlights the historical impact of third-party movements and labor organizing on the Democratic Party. They also dissect the conflicting support for Hillary Clinton versus Bernie Sanders during the 2016 primary, including media influence and internal left tensions. Lastly, the talk focuses on Sanders' strategies, political endorsements, and how global events shaped his campaign.

08:19

Creator website

AI Summary

AI Chapters

Episode notes

Podcast summary created with Snipd AI

Quick takeaways

Supporting third parties is essential for pushing established parties like the Democrats to reform and adopt progressive policies.

The Democratic Party's alignment with elite interests has frustrated left-leaning constituents, highlighting the need for candidates who address working-class economic anxieties.

Deep dives

The Role of Third Parties in Politics

Supporting third parties is essential in challenging the dominance of established political parties, particularly the Democratic Party, which has shown resistance to significant reform. Historical examples demonstrate that vibrant outside parties, such as the socialist movements during the New Deal era, have successfully pressured major parties to adopt progressive policies. Currently, gaining ballot access and federal funding for third parties is crucial, as it helps protect them from being sidelined by larger parties that aim to preserve their influence. This support is viewed as a long-term strategy that can eventually lead to meaningful reform and representation for the populace.

Intro

3min

Conflicted Support in the 2016 Democratic Primary

2min

Analysis of Bernie Sanders' Political Strategy and Endorsements

3min

Subscribe to Bad Faith on Patreon to instantly unlock this episode and our entire premium episode library: http://patreon.com/badfaithpodcast

Academic, author, & ordained minister Michael Eric Dyson joins Bad Faith to debate the merits of voting for Kamala Harris specifically -- and Democrats more broadly -- as increasing numbers of the party membership acknowledge that they require significant reform after their 2024 electoral defeat. Are those claiming that "Bernie would have won" in 2016 and 2020 right? Or is there a case to be made for the more centrist Democratic Party approach -- even now? Rarely is someone with as large a platform as Dr. Dyson willing to join a progressive podcast for a rich debate on progressive strategy, so this one is a real treat.

Subscribe to Bad Faith on YouTube for video of this episode. Find Bad Faith on Twitter (@badfaithpod) and Instagram (@badfaithpod).

Produced by Armand Aviram.

Theme by Nick Thorburn (@nickfromislands).