Politicians Demand Still-More Israel Censorship, w/ Brad Polumbo. PLUS, Lee Fang: Is Biblical Prophecy a Key Reason for GOP Israel Support? Have Conservatives Abandoned Free Speech? | SYSTEM UPDATE #171
Oct 27, 2023
auto_awesome
Brad Polumbo and Lee Fang join to discuss rising censorship in American politics, particularly regarding Israel. They highlight the exploitation of the Israel-Palestine conflict for attacks on free speech, the influence of Christian Zionists in US-Israel policy, censorship on college campuses, and the importance of protecting free speech rights.
Deporting pro-Palestinian international students based on their political views violates their First Amendment rights.
Conservative support for deportation contradicts their vocal defense of free speech against cancel culture.
Many members of Congress supporting Israel prioritize religious beliefs over US interests or human rights.
Deep dives
Governor DeSantis Calls for Deportation of Pro-Palestinian Students
Governor Ron DeSantis has proposed selectively deporting international students who have participated in pro-Palestinian protests, arguing that their activities support terrorism. However, these protests are protected by the First Amendment, unless they incite imminent violence or cross into criminal activity. Deporting students based on their political views is fundamentally un-American and goes against the values of free speech and expression. The Supreme Court has ruled that immigrants, once in the country legally, have First Amendment rights. Supporting censorship based on political beliefs sets a dangerous precedent and can be used against any group or cause in the future.
Selective Deportation and Violation of First Amendment Rights
Governor DeSantis's proposal to selectively deport foreign students based on their pro-Palestinian views violates their First Amendment rights. While the right to deny visas may be applicable for legal immigrants, once they are in the country, they are protected by the First Amendment. Political speech, even if controversial or offensive, is protected unless it incites imminent lawless action. It is essential to uphold the principles of free speech and expression for all individuals, regardless of their immigration status.
Inconsistent Application of Free Speech Principles
The conservative support for Governor DeSantis's proposal raises questions about the consistency in applying free speech principles. While conservatives have been vocal in defending free speech rights against the so-called 'woke mob' and cancel culture, this support for deporting students based on their political views contradicts those principles. Defending free speech means standing up for the rights of all individuals, even when we disagree with their views.
The Influence of Religious Beliefs on US-Israel Relations
Many members of Congress who support Israel cite their religious dogma as the reason. They believe that Israel's strength is necessary for the return of Jesus and the fulfillment of biblical prophecies. This belief shapes their decision-making and influences US policy towards Israel. There is a significant number of Christian Zionists in Congress who prioritize supporting Israel based on religious grounds, rather than US interests or human rights. This tight relationship between US lawmakers and Israel, driven by religious convictions, has been nurtured for decades.
Threats to Free Speech and Censorship in Relation to Israel-Palestine
The podcast episode discusses disturbing proposals for censorship targeting critics of Israel or supporters of Palestine. Activism against Israel is portrayed as one of the greatest threats to free speech in the West. However, censorship campaigns are losing in US courts. The episode highlights Governor Ron DeSantis and his promotion of unconstitutional laws, advocating for banning student groups like Students for Justice in Palestine. This approach compromises free speech and targets specific viewpoints. The episode emphasizes the importance of defending free speech, even when dealing with controversial or offensive opinions.