TBD | Why Trump’s Data Purge is a Digital Book Burning
Feb 9, 2025
auto_awesome
Jason Koebler, cofounder of 404 Media, dives into the alarming consequences of government data purging under Trump’s directives. They discuss how executive orders reshape health and science data, erasing critical information pertaining to diversity and inclusion. Koebler highlights the threats to rare disease treatment and public health due to data manipulation. The episode also scrutinizes the ethical dilemmas faced by federal employees and the efforts of archivists to protect vital government data during political shifts.
The political manipulation and removal of crucial health data threaten recent advancements in diagnosing rare diseases, impacting both researchers and patients.
Erosion of trust in governmental data provision jeopardizes democratic integrity, as misinformation could hinder informed decision-making among citizens.
Deep dives
The Role of Data in Rare Disease Diagnosis
Data plays a crucial role in diagnosing rare diseases, which affect approximately one in 14 individuals. By utilizing genetic sequencing and cross-referencing information from global databases, healthcare professionals can connect patients with similar genetic mutations to identify potential treatments. This rapid data analysis has significantly improved the diagnosis timeline from ten years to just two or three days in recent years. However, concerns arise as political changes threaten the accessibility and sharing of vital health data, potentially reversing advancements made in the rare disease community.
Impact of Government Data Restricted Access
Recently, significant changes have occurred regarding government data availability, particularly from agencies like the CDC and NIH. Many websites and datasets have either been taken offline or altered to align with certain political agendas, thus raising alarms among researchers and healthcare professionals. The deletion of approximately 8,000 government webpages highlights the extent of this issue, which is part of a broader trend of restricting access to important information concerning health and demographics. The ongoing efforts to restore these datasets remain a pressing concern for public health and research accuracy.
Consequences for Science and Democracy
The removal of government data raises serious implications for both scientific research and democratic integrity. As federal data often underpins economic indicators and public health guidance, its inaccessibility could lead to misinformation and hinder progress in various fields. When the government becomes less reliable in its data provision, it not only affects scientific research but also jeopardizes public trust in governmental institutions. This erosion of trust poses a risk to democracy, as citizens may struggle to make informed decisions without reliable data supporting their understanding of pressing issues.
Using Github, you can watch as government websites are brought into compliance with Donald Trump’s executive orders. Out goes the word “equity;” in comes “fair.” And health and science data, once publicly available, disappears.
Jeremy Prokop, data science advisor in the Midwest
Want more What Next TBD? Subscribe to Slate Plus to access ad-free listening to the whole What Next family and all your favorite Slate podcasts. Subscribe today on Apple Podcasts by clicking “Try Free” at the top of our show page. Sign up now at slate.com/whatnextplus to get access wherever you listen.