In this thought-provoking discussion, prominent philosopher Jacques Derrida delves into the latter part of his groundbreaking work, 'Of Grammatology.' He critiques logocentrism, emphasizing how speech has been unjustly elevated over writing. The conversation explores the complex interplay of writing, culture, and identity, challenging ethnocentric perspectives. Derrida highlights the interconnections between language and civilization, urging a reconsideration of societal norms and the paradoxes inherent in our understanding of origins through language.
Derrida critiques Rousseau's logocentrism by arguing that writing, often seen as secondary, is a dynamic force shaping meaning and societal structures.
The podcast emphasizes the complexities of communication, challenging the binary view of speech as liberating and writing as oppressive, revealing their intertwined nature.
Deep dives
The Logocentric Logic of Rousseau
Rousseau's philosophy exemplifies logocentrism, where speech is privileged over writing, seen as a divine, immediate representation of truth. Derrida critiques Rousseau's attempt to dismiss writing by labeling it a detached supplement that cannot convey the same authenticity as speech. This reduction of writing undermines its significance, suggesting that it is merely a tool for oppression, leading to societal hierarchies. By positioning Rousseau's ideas against Derrida’s thoughts on discourse and text, it's evident that understanding language requires recognizing the complexities of both forms of expression.
The Relationship Between Discourse, Text, and Violence
Derrida delves into the concept that writing can be perceived as a form of violence, capable of enforcing societal hierarchies and oppression. He illustrates that the nature of discourse is shaped significantly by the individual’s circumstances, impacting how texts are understood and represented. An example used is the way people adapt their discourse based on different social contexts, which highlights the fluidity and multiplicity of meaning within texts. Therefore, writing is not simply a historical artifact but a dynamic force that interacts with culture, revealing complexities in human communication.
The Ethnocentric Views of Levi-Strauss
Levi-Strauss' observations of the Nambic Wara people highlight a perceived 'innocence' linked to their lack of writing, framing speech as a purer form of communication. Derrida challenges this ethnocentric perspective by asserting that speech encompasses its own form of writing, as it too conveys meaning and authority. The act of hiding proper names from outsiders further complicates the distinction between writing and speech, suggesting that secrecy is inherent in all forms of communication. Ultimately, Derrida argues that labeling societies as 'innocent' due to the absence of writing overlooks the complexities and structures already existing within those cultures.
Rousseau's Binary between Speech and Writing
Rousseau constructs a binary opposition where speech is associated with liberty and writing with repression, yet Derrida critiques this simplistic view as failing to account for the nuanced interplay between the two. By examining the origin of language, Derrida exposes contradictions in Rousseau’s ideology, such as the conflation of need and passion in the development of language. The discussion highlights how culture shapes language and communication, demonstrating that what is deemed 'natural' or 'innate' is profoundly influenced by societal structures. This insight questions the validity of Rousseau's hierarchy and emphasizes the need to consider the complexities of communication beyond binary distinctions.
In this episode, I continue my two-part presentation of "Of Grammatology," Jacques Derrida's inaugural text to place him among the ranks of Foucault, Bourdieu, Lefebvre, Deleuze and others.
If you want to support me, you can do that with these links: