The Intelligence from The Economist

Civil proceedings: America's presidential debate

Oct 23, 2020
John Priddo, the United States editor and host of Checks and Balance, dives into the recent presidential debate, noting its increased substance compared to earlier discussions. He explores the immovability of polls despite early voting, shedding light on key policy contrasts between candidates. Additionally, the conversation shifts to South Korea's struggles with population decline and the push for women’s workforce participation. Priddo also compares the legendary careers of F1 icons Hamilton and Schumacher, revealing the complexities of evaluating greatness in racing.
Ask episode
AI Snips
Chapters
Transcript
Episode notes
ANECDOTE

First Debate Chaos

  • The first presidential debate was chaotic and unproductive.
  • Trump's constant interruptions prevented substantive policy discussion.
INSIGHT

Second Debate Improvement

  • The second debate was more civil and substantive.
  • Both candidates stuck to their allotted time, allowing for policy discussion.
INSIGHT

Moderator's Influence

  • Moderator Kristen Welker's firm handling contributed to the debate's civility.
  • Trump's advisors likely encouraged a change in strategy after the first debate's failure.
Get the Snipd Podcast app to discover more snips from this episode
Get the app