

Stathis Kalyvas & Making Sense of Putin
Mar 11, 2022
Stathis Kalyvas, a political scientist and Gladstone Professor at Oxford, delves into the motivations behind Russia's invasion of Ukraine. He challenges the narrative that NATO's expansion is solely to blame, emphasizing Putin's desire to restore Russia's glory. The discussion highlights the clash between realist and constructivist theories in international relations, examining how leaders' beliefs shape state actions. Kalyvas also connects historical contexts, like the Greek War of Independence, to contemporary geopolitical dynamics, unveiling the complexities of national identity and ambition.
AI Snips
Chapters
Books
Transcript
Episode notes
Limits of NATO Overreach Theory
- The NATO overreach theory partly explains Russia's invasion but fails on timing and ignores Ukraine's agency.
- Putin’s justifications don't align simply with NATO fears, indicating layered motivations behind the invasion.
Realism's Jungle View
- Realist theory views international politics as a jungle of self-interested states balancing power.
- States act aggressively to prevent any rival gaining advantage, assuming no central authority exists.
Rational Actor Clarified
- Rationality in IR means pursuing preferences with the best means to achieve them.
- Rational actions don't imply good outcomes or sane preferences—crazy preferences can drive rational behavior.