
Faith and Reason Exchange Chesterton, The Everlasting Man 3
Jan 15, 2025
Dive into a lively discussion on G.K. Chesterton's critique of modern historiography. The hosts tackle his metaphor about dogmatic historians and explore how narratives shape scholarship. Key topics include the dangers of scientism, Darwinian dogmatism, and the issue of chronological snobbery. They also highlight the problem of bias in peer review and the implications of recent academic hoaxes. Finally, Chesterton's insights on original sin and the importance of the family in civilization come to the forefront, linking historical wisdom to today’s cultural debates.
AI Snips
Chapters
Books
Transcript
Episode notes
Beware Progressivist Narratives
- Chesterton criticizes early 20th-century historiography for imposing progressivist narratives onto scant prehistoric evidence.
- He warns that scientists can become dogmatic, deducing grand theories from limited data rather than following evidence.
Overstories Drive Scientific Dogma
- David links Chesterton's critique to Malcolm Gladwell's idea of "over stories" that spread like social contagions.
- He argues scientism becomes an overstory that discourages critical questioning and system-two thinking.
Challenge Chronological Snobbery
- Chesterton challenges chronological snobbery and the linear 'getting better' view of history common in textbooks.
- Adam notes historians often extrapolate long narratives from thin prehistoric evidence, which Chesterton contests.











