Jimmy Akin, Senior Apologist at Catholic Answers, discusses the absence of quotations from the Deuterocanonical books in the New Testament. He explains that the lack of quotations doesn't prove that the books are noncanonical, as Jesus and the authors sometimes introduce quotations using specific formulas. Akin provides examples of quotes from non-scriptural sources to support his argument.
The absence of direct quotations from the Deuterocanonical books in the New Testament does not prove their non-canonicity as Jesus and the New Testament authors sometimes introduce quotations without using specific formulas like 'Scripture says' or 'it is written', indicating their regard for the source as Scripture.
The criterion for canonicity cannot solely rely on direct quotations in the New Testament using specific formulas, as many books of the Old Testament and even several Pro-canonical books are also not quoted, and the books of the Bible were combined differently in the first century, necessitating other arguments and evidence for the inclusion of the Deuterocanonical books in the canon.
Deep dives
Absence of quotation does not prove non-canonicity
The podcast addresses the claim that the absence of quotations from the Deuterocanonical books in the New Testament implies their non-canonicity. However, the podcast argues that Jesus and the New Testament authors sometimes introduce quotations without using specific formulas like 'Scripture says' or 'it is written', which indicates their regard for the source as Scripture. Furthermore, examples are provided where non-Scriptural sources are quoted by Jesus and the authors of the New Testament. Therefore, the absence of direct quotations from the Deuterocanonical books does not prove their non-canonicity.
Tests for canonicity and consideration for inclusion
The podcast explains that if the criterion for canonicity was strict reliance on direct quotations in the New Testament using specific formulas, many books of the Old Testament would have to be excluded. Even if quotations without these formulas are considered, there are several Pro-canonical books that are also not quoted in the New Testament. The podcast also highlights that the books of the Bible were combined differently in the first century. Therefore, the proposed test of requiring direct quotations in the New Testament does not work, and the inclusion of the Deuterocanonical books in the canon should be considered based on other arguments and evidence.
DAY 288
CHALLENGE
“Jesus and the authors of the New Testament never quote from the deuterocanonical books, so they do not belong in the Bible.”
DEFENSE
The absence of a quotation does not prove that a book is noncanonical.
Jesus and the authors of the New Testament sometimes introduce quotations in a way that makes it clear they regarded the source as a book of Scripture. This is indicated when they use formulas like “scripture says” (John 19:37; Rom. 9:17, 10:11, 11:2) or “it is written” (Matt. 4:4; Mark 1:2; Luke 7:27, etc.).
When these formulas are not present, it is not always clea…
Get the Snipd podcast app
Unlock the knowledge in podcasts with the podcast player of the future.
AI-powered podcast player
Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features
Discover highlights
Listen to the best highlights from the podcasts you love and dive into the full episode
Save any moment
Hear something you like? Tap your headphones to save it with AI-generated key takeaways
Share & Export
Send highlights to Twitter, WhatsApp or export them to Notion, Readwise & more
AI-powered podcast player
Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features
Discover highlights
Listen to the best highlights from the podcasts you love and dive into the full episode