This Means War Air combat power vs IAMD
39 snips
Apr 7, 2025 In this discussion, Justin Bronk, a Senior Research Fellow for Air Power at RUSI in London, illuminates the surprising resilience and evolving capabilities of the Russian Air Force after three years of conflict in Ukraine. He argues that traditional air power and piloted aircraft still hold critical value, despite the rise of drones. Bronk also critiques NATO’s reliance on the US model while stressing the urgent need for European nations to adapt their military strategies and strengthen their air power in the face of emerging threats.
AI Snips
Chapters
Transcript
Episode notes
Evolving Russian Threat and Air Power's Importance
- The Russian military has grown stronger and more experienced, posing a greater threat to European security.
- Air power is crucial for Europe to deter Russia, requiring specific capabilities to counter their evolving tactics.
Reliance on Airpower
- NATO doctrine relies heavily on airpower, similar to historical approaches, prompting discussions about its effectiveness.
- There is a debate about whether to prioritize more missiles and launchers instead of focusing on aircraft.
Drones vs. Manned Aircraft
- Autonomous weapons and drones are seen as potential replacements for crewed aircraft.
- Despite this, procurement still focuses on traditional combat aircraft.