

The World War Two Series: Episode 17-Q&A w/ Thomas777 - 4/4
Sep 2, 2025
In this engaging discussion, Thomas777, a revisionist historian and fiction writer known for his insights on World War II, dives deep into the complexities of the Nuremberg Trials. He explores the moral dilemmas faced by leaders like Churchill and the implications of wartime justice, particularly regarding Rudolf Hess. Thomas also reflects on the political landscape of post-war Germany, the treatment of Nazi officials, and the enduring legacies of fascism. With a mix of historical analysis and personal anecdotes, he offers a thought-provoking perspective on a pivotal moment in history.
AI Snips
Chapters
Books
Transcript
Episode notes
Nuremberg Emerged From Postwar Politics
- Nuremberg was largely ad hoc and shaped by immediate postwar politics rather than longplanned legal theory.
- Roosevelt's death and Truman's urgency strongly steered the tribunal's form and personnel.
Why Robert Jackson Led The U.S. Delegation
- Robert Jackson's selection combined legal reputation with optical political acceptability to Allies.
- His outsider profile and principled stands made him a strategic pick for leading the U.S. delegation.
Allied Factions Shaped Tribunal Limits
- Policy differences among Allied figures (Stimson vs. Morgenthau vs. Churchill) shaped tribunal aims and limits.
- Morgenthau's punitive blueprint nearly prevailed until pushback and Roosevelt's death intervened.