Trump's Terms
Nixon attorney: "Richard Nixon would have had a pass" with this Supreme Court
Jul 2, 2024
NPR Justice Correspondent Carrie Johnson discusses what would have happened if today's Supreme Court ruled on Nixon's case. The impact of the immunity ruling on Trump and Nixon is analyzed, sparking concerns about presidential accountability. The fallout from the decision on Trump's sentencing delay is explored, along with his maneuvering post-ruling.
05:24
Episode guests
AI Summary
AI Chapters
Episode notes
Podcast summary created with Snipd AI
Quick takeaways
- The Supreme Court ruling granting presidents broad immunity affects Trump's legal cases, leading to potential delays and protection in various aspects.
- If the current immunity ruling existed during Nixon's presidency, he might have avoided criminal exposure, reflecting concerns about presidential power and accountability.
Deep dives
Implications of the Supreme Court's Ruling on Trump's Legal Cases
The Supreme Court's landmark decision granting presidents broad immunity is affecting former President Trump's legal cases. This decision has led to a delay in Trump's sentencing for the New York Hush Money trial as the judge reconsiders its impact on Trump's conviction. The ruling provides Trump with legal protection in various aspects, potentially impacting the special counsel's case against him. The majority opinion indicates that certain presidential actions, previously restricted since Watergate, are now shielded.
Remember Everything You Learn from Podcasts
Save insights instantly, chat with episodes, and build lasting knowledge - all powered by AI.
